Comparison

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Kia Niro

Range, charging, value, and utility compared using primary trims.

Best range Ford Mustang Mach-E 320 mi vs 253 mi
Best value Kia Niro $42,995 vs $39,850
Faster charging Kia Niro 46 min vs 45 min
Weighted profile Kia Niro 4.5 vs 5.5

Category winners

5 available
Range winner
Ford Mustang Mach-E
320 mi vs 253 mi
Value winner
Ford Mustang Mach-E
$134/mi vs $158/mi
Charging winner
Kia Niro
45 min vs 46 min
Efficiency winner
Kia Niro
300 Wh/mi vs 307 Wh/mi
Utility/family winner
Kia Niro
75.3 utility index

Side-by-side comparison

Primary trims
Spec Ford Mustang Mach-E Kia Niro
Trim used RWD Extended Electric
MSRP (USD) $42,995 $39,850
Range 320 mi 253 mi
Efficiency 307 Wh/mi • 3.26 mi/kWh 300 Wh/mi • 3.33 mi/kWh
Battery (usable) 92 kWh 64.8 kWh
Seats 5 5
Drivetrain RWD FWD
Body type SUV Crossover
DC max 216 kW 85 kW
AC max 11 kW 11 kW
10–80% (DC) 46 min 45 min
Roadtrip score 58.6 46.3
Miles added (15 min est.) 68 mi 50 mi
USD per mile of range 134 $/mi 158 $/mi
Top speed 112 mph 104 mph
Cargo 14 cu ft 17 cu ft
Tow rating 1,653 lb 1,653 lb

Who should choose which?

  • Choose Ford Mustang Mach-E if you want the longer rated range (320 mi vs 253 mi).
  • Choose Kia Niro if fast road-trip charging matters (10–80%: 45 min vs 46 min).
  • For “range per dollar”, Ford Mustang Mach-E looks better ($134/mi vs $158/mi).

Weighted verdict

Kia Niro has the stronger weighted profile (5.5 vs 4.5).

Ford Mustang Mach-E4.5 Kia Niro5.5 216 kW46 min 85 kW45 min

Related comparisons

All comparisons